candidate to add: Samsung Galaxy Watch5

[Micah Williams]

Hi Denver,

Thank you for prompt response, here is what my attempt revealed.

"The inital tarball included separate .zip and README files for both the
Kernel and Platform components. Unfortunately, I was unable to proceed with
serious testing of either component due to the extraordinary system
requirements.

Specifically:

   - The Platform build requires 500+ GB of storage
   - The Kernel toolchain, according to its README, requires 400 GB of
   storage and a minimum of 64 GB of RAM

These requirements significantly exceed the resources available on my
system and I would imagine might also be challenging for most standard
development environments.

My assumption is that these are more in-line with the expectations of
enterprise-grade hardware or specialized build environments, not a typical
development environment."

Let me know if you'd like me to provide any additional details about the
documentation or if there are alternative approaches I should consider for
testing.

Best regards, Micah

On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 4:35 PM Denver Gingerich <
compliance at sfconservancy.org> wrote:

> Hi Micah,
>
> Thanks very much for the submission!  Please feel free to reply to the
> email about this candidate, making sure that
> ccs-review at lists.sfconservancy.org is in the To line, with any comments
> you have on the steps you took to try building it.
>
> Denver
>
>
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 10:45:07PM +0000, Micah Williams wrote:
> > Small correction on the source candidate filename, the original one was
> for
> > China I believe.
> > manufacturer/brand of device: Samsung
> > model number of device: Galaxy Watch5 (SM-R900)
> > version number of software on device (if applicable): N/A
> > filename(s) of source candidate: SM-R900_NA_Opensource.zip
> > filename(s) of firmware image (if applicable): N/A
> > how the firmware image was acquired (if applicable): N/A
> > text of the offer for source (usually required):
> > [image: Screenshot 2025-05-09 164224.png]
> > where the offer for source was found:
> >
> https://www.samsung.com/us/business/support/owners/product/galaxy-watch5-bluetooth/
> > where the source or offer for source was found:
> >
> https://opensource.samsung.com/uploadList?menuItem=mobile&classification1=wearable_/_iot
> >
> > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 10:12 PM Micah Williams <
> shoelessmicah10 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > manufacturer/brand of device: Samsung
> > > model number of device: Galaxy Watch5 (SM-R900)
> > > version number of software on device (if applicable): N/A
> > > filename(s) of source candidate:
> > > SM-R900_CHN_Opensource_R900ZCU1CXK2_diff.zip
> > > filename(s) of firmware image (if applicable): N/A
> > > how the firmware image was acquired (if applicable): N/A
> > > text of the offer for source (usually required):
> > > [image: Screenshot 2025-05-09 164224.png]
> > > where the offer for source was found:
> > >
> https://www.samsung.com/us/business/support/owners/product/galaxy-watch5-bluetooth/
> > > where the source or offer for source was found:
> > >
> https://opensource.samsung.com/uploadList?menuItem=mobile&classification1=wearable_/_iot
> > >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sfconservancy.org/pipermail/ccs-review/attachments/20250513/f9ab6ac7/attachment.html>