Forgejo instead of Gitea

[Jeremy Stanley]

On 2024-12-18 20:27:29 +0100 (+0100), fossdd wrote:
> can I motivate you to avoid referencing Gitea and name Forgejo[1]
> instead.
> 
> See https://forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/:
> 
> > Forgejo was created in October 2022 after a for profit company
> > took over the Gitea project. It exists under the umbrella of a
> > non-profit organization, Codeberg e.V. and is developed in the
> > interest of the general public.
> 
> Since then, Gitea is open-core and Forgejo is the open-source fork.
> 
> [1] https://forgejo.org

Having used Gitea and worked with its maintainers since well before
the unfortunate falling out and personal disagreements between them
and the folks who initiated the Forgejo fork, I've seen absolutely
nothing to support the accusations constantly being lobbed at the
Gitea project, but there seem to be plenty of unquestioning
followers spreading those claims without producing any real proof to
back them up. It would be great if everyone could just set their
differences and perceived slights aside and get back to producing
good, open source alternatives to actual proprietary services rather
than turning on each other and wasting precious time with all this
unnecessary in-fighting. We're all in this together, it's not a
competition.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sfconservancy.org/pipermail/give-up-github/attachments/20241219/bfeb3edc/attachment.sig>