[PATCH 1 of 3] changeset_status: add unit tests for calculation of overall status
Mads Kiilerich
mads at kiilerich.com
Sat Apr 18 18:49:18 EDT 2015
On 04/18/2015 04:11 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire at gmail.com>
> # Date 1429274977 -7200
> # Fri Apr 17 14:49:37 2015 +0200
> # Node ID 928837725c3c0d8e7e8fbef23b7e12d5a4ddb66c
> # Parent 6e760af6050e567239155a7a43b5ab02eddf877d
> changeset_status: add unit tests for calculation of overall status
>
> Add unit tests for the calculation of the review status of a changeset/pull
> request. To allow this, some reorganization of the ChangesetStatusModel is
> needed.
>
> diff --git a/kallithea/model/changeset_status.py b/kallithea/model/changeset_status.py
> --- a/kallithea/model/changeset_status.py
> +++ b/kallithea/model/changeset_status.py
> @@ -66,9 +66,27 @@
> q = q.order_by(ChangesetStatus.version.asc())
> return q
>
> + def _calculate_status(self, statuses):
> + """
> + Given a list of statuses, calculate the resulting status, according to
> + the policy: approve if consensus.
> + """
> +
> + approved_votes = 0
> + for st in statuses:
> + if st and st.status == ChangesetStatus.STATUS_APPROVED:
> + approved_votes += 1
> +
> + result = ChangesetStatus.STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW
> + if approved_votes and approved_votes == len(statuses):
> + result = ChangesetStatus.STATUS_APPROVED
> +
> + return result
> +
> def calculate_pull_request_result(self, pull_request):
> """
> - Policy: approve if consensus. Only approve and reject counts as valid votes.
> + Return a tuple (reviewers, pending reviewers, pull request status)
> + Only approve and reject counts as valid votes.
> """
>
> # collect latest votes from all voters
> @@ -77,24 +95,21 @@
> pull_request=pull_request,
> with_revisions=True)):
> cs_statuses[st.author.username] = st
> +
> # collect votes from official reviewers
> pull_request_reviewers = []
> pull_request_pending_reviewers = []
> - approved_votes = 0
> + relevant_statuses = []
> for r in pull_request.reviewers:
> st = cs_statuses.get(r.user.username)
> - if st and st.status == ChangesetStatus.STATUS_APPROVED:
> - approved_votes += 1
> + relevant_statuses.append(st)
> if not st or st.status in (ChangesetStatus.STATUS_NOT_REVIEWED,
> ChangesetStatus.STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW):
> st = None
> pull_request_pending_reviewers.append(r.user)
> pull_request_reviewers.append((r.user, st))
>
> - # calculate result
> - result = ChangesetStatus.STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW
> - if approved_votes and approved_votes == len(pull_request.reviewers):
> - result = ChangesetStatus.STATUS_APPROVED
> + result = self._calculate_status(relevant_statuses)
>
> return (pull_request_reviewers,
> pull_request_pending_reviewers,
> diff --git a/kallithea/tests/models/test_changeset_status.py b/kallithea/tests/models/test_changeset_status.py
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kallithea/tests/models/test_changeset_status.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +from kallithea.tests import *
> +from kallithea.model.changeset_status import ChangesetStatusModel
> +from kallithea.model.db import ChangesetStatus
> +
> +# shorthands
> +STATUS_APPROVED = ChangesetStatus.STATUS_APPROVED
> +STATUS_REJECTED = ChangesetStatus.STATUS_REJECTED
> +STATUS_NOT_REVIEWED = ChangesetStatus.STATUS_NOT_REVIEWED
> +STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW = ChangesetStatus.STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW
We could perhaps just import ChangesetStatus as CS?
> +
> +class ChangesetStatusMock(object):
> +
> + def __init__(self, status):
> + self.status = status
> +
> +S = ChangesetStatusMock
Perhaps use a less short abbreviation such as CSM? Perhaps name it that
way when it is defined and make it clear what the full name would be?
> +
> +class TestChangesetStatusCalculation(BaseTestCase):
> +
> + def setUp(self):
> + self.m = ChangesetStatusModel()
> +
> + @parameterized.expand([
> + ('empty list', STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW, []),
> + ('approve', STATUS_APPROVED, [S(STATUS_APPROVED)]),
> + ('approve2', STATUS_APPROVED, [S(STATUS_APPROVED), S(STATUS_APPROVED)]),
> + ('approve_reject', STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW, [S(STATUS_APPROVED), S(STATUS_REJECTED)]),
> + ('approve_underreview', STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW, [S(STATUS_APPROVED), S(STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW)]),
> + ('approve_notreviewed', STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW, [S(STATUS_APPROVED), S(STATUS_NOT_REVIEWED)]),
> + ('underreview', STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW, [S(STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW), S(STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW)]),
> + ('reject', STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW, [S(STATUS_REJECTED)]),
> + ('reject_underreview', STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW, [S(STATUS_REJECTED), S(STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW)]),
> + ('reject_notreviewed', STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW, [S(STATUS_REJECTED), S(STATUS_NOT_REVIEWED)]),
> + ('notreviewed', STATUS_UNDER_REVIEW, [S(STATUS_NOT_REVIEWED)]),
> + ])
> + def test_result(self, name, expected_result, statuses):
> + result = self.m._calculate_status(statuses)
> + self.assertEqual(result, expected_result)
> +
More information about the kallithea-general
mailing list