[PATCH] pullrequests: add support for custom pull request id prefix

Jan Heylen heyleke at gmail.com
Sun Apr 19 13:16:37 EDT 2015

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mads Kiilerich <mads at kiilerich.com> wrote:
> By the way ... it has been mentioned before that the term "pull request" is
> weird for most workflows.
> Inspired by discussions with people at the Mercurial sprint, I think I am
> settling on using the term "series". It is all about presenting a series of
> changes / patches / changesets so they can be previewed, reviewed, commented
> on, approved or rejected, pulled and tested, rebased, grafted, "evolved" and
> whatever you can come up with.

In our instance(s), we have already a separate 'Translation' for this
matter: and in that 'Translation', we called it "review request', as
that is the purpose we use it for in our instance currently. But
you're right, the out-of-the-box experience and 'Pull request' which
isn't automatic pulled after approval is rather confusing... 'series'
is also a more general name, which we could also could consider using
for purposes where such a "series" goes beyond the scope of reviewing
(e.g. as a reference to a defect, story, ...) .


> /Mads
> _______________________________________________
> kallithea-general mailing list
> kallithea-general at sfconservancy.org
> http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general

More information about the kallithea-general mailing list