[PATCH] pullrequests: add support for custom pull request id prefix
Mads Kiilerich
mads at kiilerich.com
Mon Apr 20 17:35:03 EDT 2015
On 04/20/2015 05:55 AM, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Mads Kiilerich <mads at kiilerich.com> wrote:
>
>> I would probably take a patch that moved the hardcoded # naming to a method
>> on the PullRequest db model, similar to how we have .url . It would be very
>> much like the existing .pull_request_id field so perhaps name it .nice_id?
> Shouldn't it be symmetrical: pull_request_nice_id or something like that?
Probably ... but that is a long name and I'm lazy ;-)
Right ...
>
>> It is a bit weird that Kallithea pull request numbers are global. Especially
>> in a site that is hosting repos for multiple independent users, it would
>> make sense to have per repo numbering. Would that solve your case? Will your
>> repos in the different instances be named differently?
> No, the different instances would operate on the same repositories
> with the same names (note that we're not using Kallithea for repo
> hosting, it is a mirror).
Using it as a mirror is fine ... but having multiple independent
instances does not seem like something I can recommend. It would make
more sense to have multiple servers on the same database in some
failover loadbalancing setup.
> Also, global IDs have the benefit of being completely standalone. If
> we have per-repo IDs, I cannot tell you 'look at pull request 5',
> because I would have to tell you which repo to look in.
In general I think it is a good thing to have to specify which repo a PR
is for.
Your case of multiple series for the same repo with the same numbering
scheme ... that is just ... no! Just say no! ;-)
Anyway, I think you can do what you want with some upstreamed
refactorings and some system for monkeypatching extensions.
/Mads
More information about the kallithea-general
mailing list