[PATCH 3 of 7] comment: add draft flag for comments
Mads Kiilerich
mads at kiilerich.com
Fri Apr 24 13:20:50 EDT 2015
On 04/14/2015 06:03 PM, Jan Heylen wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Jan Heylen <heyleke at gmail.com>
> # Date 1427735588 -7200
> # Mon Mar 30 19:13:08 2015 +0200
> # Node ID f48bc03627761dd62f7e7094bb0d322834da336c
> # Parent 55ba8e68269da8fb0c33c65711a57b4fd9e1b675
> comment: add draft flag for comments
>
> diff -r 55ba8e68269d -r f48bc0362776 kallithea/model/comment.py
> --- a/kallithea/model/comment.py Fri Mar 27 16:13:46 2015 +0100
> +++ b/kallithea/model/comment.py Mon Mar 30 19:13:08 2015 +0200
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
>
> def create(self, text, repo, user, revision=None, pull_request=None,
> f_path=None, line_no=None, status_change=None, closing_pr=False,
> - send_email=True):
> + send_email=True, draft=False):
> """
> Creates new comment for changeset or pull request.
> If status_change is not None this comment is associated with a
> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
> comment.text = text
> comment.f_path = f_path
> comment.line_no = line_no
> - comment.draft = False
> + comment.draft = draft
>
> if revision:
> comment.revision = revision
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
> Session().add(comment)
> Session().flush()
>
> - if send_email:
> + if (not draft) and send_email:
> (subj, body, recipients, notification_type,
> email_kwargs) = self._get_notification_data(
> repo, comment, user,
> @@ -250,7 +250,64 @@
>
> return comment
>
> - def get_comments(self, repo_id, revision=None, pull_request=None):
> + def draft_to_comment(self, repo, draft, user, status_change, closing_pr):
> + draft = self.__get_changeset_comment(draft)
> + draft.draft = False
> + (subj, body, recipients, notification_type,
> + email_kwargs) = self._get_notification_data(
> + repo, draft, user,
> + comment_text=draft.text,
> + line_no=draft.line_no,
> + revision=draft.revision,
> + pull_request=draft.pull_request,
> + status_change=status_change,
> + closing_pr=closing_pr)
> +
> + mentions = set(self._extract_mentions(body)).difference(recipients)
> +
> + return subj, body, recipients, notification_type, email_kwargs, mentions
> +
> + def commit_drafts(self, repo_id, user_id, revision=None, pull_request=None, status_change=None):
> + repo = self._get_repo(repo_id)
> + user = self._get_user(user_id)
> + bodies = []
> + mention_recipients = set()
> +
> + drafts = self.get_inline_drafts(repo_id, revision=revision, pull_request=pull_request, user_id=user_id)
> + for __,lines in drafts:
> + for draftlist in lines.values():
> + for draft in draftlist:
> + (subj, body, recipients, notification_type,
> + email_kwargs, mentions) = self.draft_to_comment(repo, draft, user, None, False)
> + bodies.append(body)
> + mention_recipients.update(mentions)
> + gen_drafts = self.get_comments(repo_id, revision=revision, pull_request=pull_request, user_id=user_id, draft=True)
> + for draft in gen_drafts:
> + (subj, body, recipients, notification_type,
> + email_kwargs, mentions) = self.draft_to_comment(repo, draft, user, status_change, False)
> + bodies.append(body)
> + mention_recipients.update(mentions)
> +
> + if email_kwargs:
> + email_kwargs['is_mention'] = False
> + # create notification objects, and emails
> + NotificationModel().create(
> + created_by=user_id, subject=subj, body=None, bodies=bodies,
> + recipients=recipients, type_=notification_type,
> + email_kwargs=email_kwargs)
> +
> + if mention_recipients:
> + email_kwargs['is_mention'] = True
> + subj = _('[Mention]') + ' ' + subj
> + NotificationModel().create(
> + created_by=user_id, subject=subj, body=None, bodies=bodies,
> + recipients=mention_recipients,
> + type_=notification_type,
> + email_kwargs=email_kwargs
> + )
> + return drafts
There seems to be a lot of duplication of existing code here. Could we
start with a refactoring that extract methods for writing/updating a
comment and for sending mails? At first without considering draftness
and only used with lists of one.
> +
> + def get_comments(self, repo_id, revision=None, pull_request=None, user_id=None, draft=False):
> """
> Gets main comments based on revision or pull_request_id
>
> @@ -270,6 +327,12 @@
> q = q.filter(ChangesetComment.pull_request == pull_request)
> else:
> raise Exception('Please specify revision or pull_request')
> +
> + q = q.filter(ChangesetComment.draft == draft)
> +
> + if user_id:
> + q = q.filter(ChangesetComment.user_id == user_id)
I guess this touches upon the question: how private are draft comments?
Does it make sense to ask for draft comments without specifying a user_id?
> +
> q = q.order_by(ChangesetComment.created_on)
> return q.all()
>
> @@ -278,6 +341,7 @@
> .filter(ChangesetComment.repo_id == repo_id)\
> .filter(ChangesetComment.line_no != None)\
> .filter(ChangesetComment.f_path != None)\
> + .filter(ChangesetComment.draft == False)\
> .order_by(ChangesetComment.comment_id.asc())\
>
> if revision:
> @@ -295,3 +359,31 @@
> for co in comments:
> paths[co.f_path][co.line_no].append(co)
> return paths.items()
> +
> +
> + def get_inline_drafts(self, repo_id, revision=None, pull_request=None, user_id=None):
Docstring, please. What is the intention with this function?
> + q = Session().query(ChangesetComment)\
> + .filter(ChangesetComment.repo_id == repo_id)\
> + .filter(ChangesetComment.line_no != None)\
> + .filter(ChangesetComment.f_path != None)\
> + .filter(ChangesetComment.draft == True)\
> + .order_by(ChangesetComment.comment_id.asc())\
> +
> + if revision:
> + q = q.filter(ChangesetComment.revision == revision)
> + elif pull_request:
> + pull_request = self.__get_pull_request(pull_request)
> + q = q.filter(ChangesetComment.pull_request == pull_request)
> + else:
> + raise Exception('Please specify revision or pull_request_id')
> +
> + if user_id:
> + q = q.filter(ChangesetComment.user_id == user_id)
> +
> + comments = q.all()
> +
> + paths = defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(list))
> +
> + for co in comments:
> + paths[co.f_path][co.line_no].append(co)
> + return paths.items()
More information about the kallithea-general
mailing list