PR webhooks to trigger automation?
Brandon Jones
bjones14 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 21 15:19:21 UTC 2017
I would further vouch for Redmine. We use a combination of Kallithea and
Redmine at our company and have had no real issues with it, and it has
suited our needs quite well. Redmine is a well-adopted solution that has a
feature-rich library of plugins that allow for it to compete right up there
with JIRA.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:06 AM Long Vu <long.vu at intelerad.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Jani Tiainen <redetin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Company I work for has been using both Kallithea and Redmine for a
> several
> > years now.
> >
> > Redmine works well - it has a lot of options but still relatively easy to
> > setup and use.
>
> I've heard good comments about Redmine too. It is not as feature rich
> as Jira but could be a viable alternative if one wants to stay with
> open-source.
>
> >
> > We mainly use it's issue tracker and wiki.
> > I don't remember having any major issues.
> >
> > If you want to know spesifics I can try to answer.
> >
> > 21.7.2017 16.12 "Andrew Miller" <a.miller at neath-porttalbot.gov.uk>
> > kirjoitti:
> >
> > Has anyone looked at Redmine for project management? It supports issue
> > tracking and has built in wiki capabilities.
> >
> > (I've never used JIRA or Taiga, and only briefly looked at Redmine, so I
> > don't know how they compare feature-wise).
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kallithea-general [mailto:
> kallithea-general-bounces at sfconservancy.org]
> > On Behalf Of Thomas De Schampheleire
> > Sent: 20 July 2017 21:00
> > To: Dominik Ruf
> > Cc: Kallithea
> > Subject: Re: PR webhooks to trigger automation?
> >
> > 2017-07-19 21:23 GMT+02:00 Dominik Ruf <dominikruf at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>
> >> Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin at gmail.com> schrieb am Mi.,
> 19.
> >> Juli 2017 um 19:55 Uhr:
> >>>
> > [..]
> >>>
> >>> I think we should decide upon some kind of roadmap after 1.0 and
> >>> start discussing and implementing such features one by one.
> >>> That is, I think we should try getting out 0.9 and 1.0 soon, with 0.9
> >>> being current default + bootstrap, and 1.0 being 0.9 with some of the
> >>> near-ready PRs finalized, and avoid diverting into new territory too
> >>> much before 1.0 is out.
> >>
> >> I agree.
> >> And I'd like to use this occasion to re-iterate on my suggestion to
> >> use JIRA to manage the project.
> >> I think JIRA could really help with planning releases.
> >> It is also much easier, to discuss ideas, like the ones above, in
> >> JIRA, then in a wiki, don't you think?
> >>
> >> I'd also volontiere to manage JIRA.
> >>
> >
> > I dug up the old discussion on the topic:
> >
> https://lists.sfconservancy.org/pipermail/kallithea-general/2016q4/002150.html
> >
> > At the time it felt a bit overkill to me, but right now I agree that it
> > could perhaps help us and I think we should try it.
> > Nevertheless, most of my comments from the previous thread still hold.
> > [
> https://lists.sfconservancy.org/pipermail/kallithea-general/2016q4/002161.html
> ]
> > In particular, I think we should migrate completely from old issues on
> > Bitbucket to the new system.
> >
> > Regarding JIRA vs something else:
> > - I prefer open-source projects if possible
> > - Storyboard:
> > - is it somewhat mature, will it stay? (It would be a pity if we need
> to
> > switch to something else many times)
> > - does the openstack instance allow hosting for non-openstack projects
> > like Kallithea, or do we need to set up our own instance?
> > - does anyone have experience with it already?
> >
> > - As stated in the previous mail thread, I'd like to get rid of Bitbucket
> > completely: code hosting and pull requests should move to our own
> kallithea,
> > what is left are issues and wiki. If we move issues to something new that
> > does not have a wiki capabability, perhaps we should find something else
> for
> > wiki.
> > (although much of the existing wiki can be seen as tasks/issues and thus
> be
> > moved, I think there is still content that better lives in a real wiki).
> >
> > - Andrew and you looked at Taiga previously, what was the conclusion of
> > that?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> > _______________________________________________
> > kallithea-general mailing list
> > kallithea-general at sfconservancy.org
> > https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
> > _______________________________________________
> > kallithea-general mailing list
> > kallithea-general at sfconservancy.org
> > https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kallithea-general mailing list
> > kallithea-general at sfconservancy.org
> > https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Long Vu | Build Controller | Intelerad | +1-514-931-6222 ext. 7743
> <(514)%20931-6222>
>
> --
>
> This email or any attachments may contain confidential or legally
> privileged information intended for the sole use of the addressees. Any
> use, redistribution, disclosure, or reproduction of this information,
> except as intended, is prohibited. If you received this email in error,
> please notify the sender and remove all copies of the message, including
> any attachments.
>
> _______________________________________________
> kallithea-general mailing list
> kallithea-general at sfconservancy.org
> https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sfconservancy.org/pipermail/kallithea-general/attachments/20170721/9b588f30/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the kallithea-general
mailing list