Performance problem
Nicolas Pinault
nicolasp at aaton.com
Mon Feb 5 08:53:53 UTC 2018
Le 31/01/2018 à 18:08, Dominik Ruf a écrit :
>
> Can you try to use 'hg serve' on the same machine, with the same
> mercurial version, on the same repository and see if checking for
> incoming is as slow as with kallithea?
>
I'll try to find some time to test it.
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018, 13:26 Nicolas Pinault <nicolasp at aaton.com
> <mailto:nicolasp at aaton.com>> wrote:
>
> Le 31/01/2018 à 12:18, Thomas De Schampheleire a écrit :
>> 2018-01-31 11:58 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Pinault<nicolasp at aaton.com> <mailto:nicolasp at aaton.com>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've changed my server. I've installed Kallithea 0.3.3 on this new server
>>> and migrated my repositories from 0.3.1 to 0.3.3.
>>> The new PC is faster than the previous one (10 years old). The new PC runs
>>> Windows server 2012, the old one was running Windows server 2003.
>>> There is no other process running on the server that notably consume
>>> processing power.
>>>
>>> This new configuration is much slower than the previous one.
>>> Checking for incoming changes takes about 20s seconds.
>>> Pushing is very slow.
>>>
>>> Any idea of why I get this performance problem ?
>>>
>> Are you using the same configuration as the old server? For example,
>> are you (still) using Celery?
> I guess celery is not used since use_celery is set to false.
>
> Here is my celery configuration :
> ####################################
> ### CELERY CONFIG ####
> ####################################
>
> use_celery = false
> broker.host = serveur
> broker.vhost = rabbitmqhost
> broker.port = 5672
> broker.user = rabbitmq
> broker.password = qweqwe
>
> celery.imports = kallithea.lib.celerylib.tasks
>
> celery.result.backend = amqp
> celery.result.dburi = amqp://
> celery.result.serialier = json
>
> #celery.send.task.error.emails = true
> #celery.amqp.task.result.expires = 18000
>
> celeryd.concurrency = 2
> #celeryd.log.file = celeryd.log
> celeryd.log.level = DEBUG
> celeryd.max.tasks.per.child = 1
>
>
>> /Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> kallithea-general mailing list
> kallithea-general at sfconservancy.org
> <mailto:kallithea-general at sfconservancy.org>
> https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sfconservancy.org/pipermail/kallithea-general/attachments/20180205/0a1a638a/attachment.html>
More information about the kallithea-general
mailing list