New side menu idea

[Dominik Ruf]

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 08:34 Thomas De Schampheleire <
patrickdepinguin at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 22:56 Dominik Ruf <dominikruf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Dominik Ruf <dominikruf at gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 27. März 2018 um
>> 23:17 Uhr:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 21:07 Thomas De Schampheleire <
>>> patrickdepinguin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2018-03-26 19:07 GMT+02:00 Dominik Ruf <dominikruf at gmail.com>:
>>>> > Hi again,
>>>> >
>>>> > and thanks again for the feedback last time.
>>>> > I made some progress and would love to hear what you think about it.
>>>> > https://kallithea-exp.dominikruf.com/kallithea/kallithea
>>>> >
>>>> https://kallithea-exp.dominikruf.com/kallithea/kallithea-domruf/changelog
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> On mobile phone, the sidebar is hidden by default (which is fine).
>>>> Clicking the menu button on the second navbar makes it visible (also
>>>> fine) but then: when you click the menu button again, there is an
>>>> animation of the sidebar 'rolling up', and it takes too long IMO. It
>>>> is not as quick as the expansion, and makes it feel sluggish.
>>>>
>>> This is the default animation of bootstrap. I thought about that myself
>>> but it didn't bother me enough to change it yet :-D
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Other than that,  it looks nice, both on mobile as on desktop. (on
>>>> mobile there are some general non-ideal points but not specific to the
>>>> sidebar).
>>>>
>>>> I like the 'number of pullrequests' overlay on the PR button, but I do
>>>> wonder how it will look like if the number is 2 or even 3 digits long.
>>>>
>>> It think it looks good with 2 digits and if you have more then 100 open
>>> pull requests I believe there is something wrong with your project. :-D
>>> BTW you can see how it looks by simply changing the text with the
>>> debugger of your browser.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The '@' sign to indicate the revision in plain text seems a bit
>>>> unprofessional. I think it could be improved in some way, but not sure
>>>> how. Perhaps with an 'at' icon.
>>>>
>>> I don't like the font for the revision hash (and @). I'm not sure what
>>> you mean by an 'at' icon though.
>>>
>> Can you tell me a bit more what you mean by "an 'at' icon" ?
>> BTW I worked a bit more on it and now all the pages use the new look. (I
>> hope I didn't forget one) And the animation should be fix now.
>> https://kallithea-exp.dominikruf.com
>>
>
> Sorry I forgot to reply on the at. What I meant was to use an at symbol
> from fontello. I searched there and found several at symbols which are a
> bit bolder than the normal bold text. I think that looks nicer.
>
Okay. I'm not sure the @ would look that much different/better as an icon.
I searched at fontello but did not find one that I liked. Can you send a
link to the one you meant?
Also note that I changed the color to match the breadcrumb separater and I
made it bold as well. I quite like it that way.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sfconservancy.org/pipermail/kallithea-general/attachments/20180406/547ceaf6/attachment.html>