Code review and coverage marks

[Andrew Shadura]

Hello,

On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:56:46 -0500
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley at gmail.com> wrote:

> > It is inconvenient anyway, and the point is that Mailman lists seem
> > to lose (a lot of?) feedback from newer generation.

> My idea would be to take the best of both worlds: have an issue
> tracker / pull request model such that commenting would be mirrored
> on the mailing list (and replies would be threaded). This would allow
> people like me to not leave their email client but also people like
> you to use the web interface to reply.

> This would hopefully allow new people to issue a pull request via the
> web but reviewers to respond with the email clients. Also, vice versa:
> mailing a patchbomb would initiate a pull request just like the web
> client would.

> This is still just a pipe dream, though. No work has been done on
> this idea. 

I think we may borrow something from the Debian BTS. It has a great
email interface, and I think that's something we must support, at least
partially.

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sfconservancy.org/pipermail/kallithea-general/attachments/20140805/a41bce9d/attachment.sig>